Mark Goldbridge compares Liverpool boss Jurgen Klopp to Man Utd legend Sir Alex Ferguson ?

20 opiniones en “Mark Goldbridge compares Liverpool boss Jurgen Klopp to Man Utd legend Sir Alex Ferguson ?”

1. That original argument was complete and utter nonsense. Liverpool hadn't won a title for 25 years when Klopp took over similar to how Utd hadn't won one for decades prior to Fergie arriving, and Liverpool were consistently finishing 7th-8th when Klopp took over. He's rebuilt Liverpool just like Fergie rebuilt Utd, and at a convenient time when a competent board knew how to market the success (MORE so, Fergie's case!) so that argument is complete crap. You're just treating your own legend like an untouchable Greek God who no mere mortal of today can possibly match. Compare Fergie's first 6 years to Klopps first 6 at Liverpool now, or Klopp's eventual length of time at Liverpool compared to the same length of time within Fergie's 26 years at Utd. THAT'S how you fairly compare them

2. Would of won title season b4 kliperty if slippy g had studs in grass. Klopp over related spent a lot of money 150 m on keeper and cb and always been able to attract the top players not like Everton who can not draw a top player just middle ranked players on top
   Wages

3. Do they drug test these people, before they come on

4. Goldbridge needs to educate himself on manchester united history, there is no way van dijk would ever replace rio vidic or even stam and theres no way salah and mane would replace yorke and cole or even giggs and becks. Goldbridge is like fletchers current role at united, hes learning on the job. I can`t wait for Simon Jordon a former club owner to test his knowledge of the game and united. Carlton don`t bow to this clown what you doing.

5. How can you be an ex-footballer and be sooooo stupid about the game? Who books him in? The man totally misrepresented Liverpool's history and sounded like a Man Utd fan….anyone would have thought Cole played for them….absolutely clueless. What I hate at the moment is these VS scenarios with Klopp or the Team VS Man City's team over the last decade or Man Utd's treble team. They are disingenuous discussions and are simply another way of bashing LFC….but us true red fans see what you're doing….its all good. We're rent free in every Prem teams head!!!

6. Struggled to minute 3 then turned off, Cole chatting ?
   Goldbridge ????

7. Brv!!

8. Bruh liverpool weren't top 4 when Klopp was appointed? They were languishing in the top half of the table..

9. Fergy win a lot thanls to the referies… the give him around 15 points a year..

10. Leeds supporter— Alex Ferguson is not comparable to Klopp, Ferguson is the most successful manager the premiership has seen . I do like Klopp and maybe in time , but at the moment nope

11. Cole is clueless

12. Man utd won leagues with 78 points LOL

13. 30 years and Klopp did it…. Ferguson took 7 years to do anything.

14. "Alex Ferguson had to build united from the ground up" klopp came into a bang average side with Gerrard a d carragher retiring this dood is clueless, klopp is the definition of building from the ground up

15. This fella defended Ole saying he is the next Klopp, everything that comes out of his mouth is utter shite

16. Man chats pup stain

17. Fergi didn't spend any money!?? He broke British records year after year since he took over Utd in 86!! As for Klopp his spending is minimal compared to Man Utd, Chelsea, Man City, Arsenal.

18. And there was me thinking Liverpool are only the most successful Trophy laden English team in history. WHAT A PAIR OF MUPPETS

19. Total crap. Worst cast I’ve had to endure.

20. Chief exec on the fa, refs scared of fergie, helped with the titles. 2 European cups in 25+ years shows when he didn't have refs in his pocket, wasn't that successful. Klopps doing it at a much harder and competitive time, fergie took 7 years to win first title when it was easier, klopp when u take all into account, is as good if not better.

Comentarios cerrados.